Lebanon Tennessee Personal Injury and Criminal Defense Attorneys practicing auto, trucking, motorcycle and all personal injury law and DUI, Assault, Seizure and all Criminal Law.
Free Consultations New

Lannom Williams Law Group - Providing criminal defense and civil trial practice for Wilson County, Tennessee

137 Public Square
Lebanon, TN 37087
FAX (615) 444-6516
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Protecting your rights and preserving your freedom...

Your Solution is a click away:
Start Here

Frank Lannom Discusses Domestic Assault Charges

Frank Lannom - Best Lebanon and Mt. Juliet Tennessee DUI and Criminal Defense LawyerYou probably saw or read in recent news that Andruw Jones, formerly of the Atlanta Braves, was arrested and charged with domestic assault. Just slightly behind DUI's in the number of calls we get from citizens in Mt. Juliet, Lebanon, and Murfreesboro, Tennessee, are calls related to arrest for domestic assault.  Like DUI offenses, domestic assault charges receive additional political and public attention.  While the seriousness of these crimes is certainly important, potential punishments related to the charge also come with the implementation of “special rules” that affect the citizen accused before a person is proven guilty.  These special rules create real problems for the citizen accused, and result in unfairness and constitutional violations.

While the Tennessee Constitution specifically states every person accused of a crime should be granted reasonable bail, except for a capital offense (1st Degree Murder), persons accused of domestic assault are held without bail for 12 hours on almost every occasion.  That is 12 hours of jail time before the person every sees the inside of a courtroom, a judge, let alone a trial by jury on the accusation. In addition, when the person is released from jail, the release is also conditioned on not physically being near or contacting the alleged victim in any manner.  

These conditions of release often place the citizen accused with the prohibition of being unable to return to their own home because the alleged victim is living at the same residence as a courtesy, or that the alleged victim is the parent of the accused citizen’s children.  An additional consequence of being accused of this crime is not being able to go near, contact or even talk to their own children.  No soccer practice, no games, no activities, not even an “I Love You” through the grandparents.

The result is an individual may be, without a trial or hearing of any kind, thrown out of their own home, held in jail for an extended time, and prevented from seeing their own children.   Because of these grave restrictions, unfortunately, people have learned how to manipulate and abuse these laws.  The allegation of domestic assault is used on many occasions as a tool in a divorce to force the opposing party out of the home and put the accusing party in custody of the children.  Orders of Protection are often sought also in conjunction with the domestic assault charge or a divorce, which can also result in further restrictions on home and contact with children.  The accused can immediately be placed in a defensive situation, not only in a divorce but in a criminal proceeding, over the most minuscule of allegations.

Always be leery of a proposed law that deal with a specific crime in way different than other laws and provides significant sanctions BEFORE there is a trial or hearing. When the sanctions come only from the story of one side, injustices will occur.

As Tennessee criminal attorney, I have been representing people accused of domestic assault for 20 years. From Nashville to Murfreesboro, Cookeville to Lebanon, Mt. Juliet to Gallatin, and most all other Middle Tennessee cities, I have helped Tennessee citizens fight for their constitutional rights when charged with this offense. In addition to assisting you with the criminal charges that result from these allegations, our firm can assist you with Orders of Protection and Divorce Proceedings that generally coincide with the institutional of criminal charges.

I invite you to research our firm further and trust you will find knowledgeable and competent attorneys with the experience to handle your unique situation. I will gladly sit down with you to discuss the serious legal issues arising from domestic assault charges, or any other criminal charges, facing you or a loved one and what can be done to help you.

~ Frank Lannom

137 Public Square Lebanon, TN 37087
Via Phone: (615) 444-2900 Via Facsimile: (615) 444-6516 Toll Free: (866) 820-4457


511 Union Street, Suite 1850 Nashville, TN 37219
Via Phone: (615) 313-3999

Lannom & Williams Is Your Solution

No matter if you’ve been charged with a crime, injured at your job or in an accident, or if you’re facing the life-changing prospect of divorce, you need a team of experienced aggressive attorneys who will fight for your rights, your recovery, and your freedom.

Let us help you.

The solution to your problem is just a phone call or a click away. Give us a call at (615) 444-2900 or just complete this short contact form to schedule your free consultation with one of our attorneys.

X Close Window
Read Full Article

Local attorney offers thoughts on air crash

wilson-post-logoThe Wilson Post | March 28, 2014

Read the full article at www.WilsonPost.com - Click Here!

Local attorney offers thoughts on air crash

Families and friends of the victims who lost their lives in the Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 crash have a long road ahead of them in learning what caused the plane to crash into the Indian Ocean on March 8, a Lebanon attorney said.

Keith Williams of the Keith Williams Law Group in Lebanon and Nashville has practiced aviation law for more than 20 years and has represented a number of victims and/or their families in legal matters regarding plane crashes. He noted that in his practice, “I have seen firsthand the harms and losses of the families like those of the passengers aboard the lost Flight 370 as they agonize over not knowing the fate of their loved ones.”

He said he hopes the finding of debris floating in the southern portion of the Indian Ocean will lead to the location and recovery of loved ones and at the same also lead to an investigation into the cause of the plane crash.

Although this accident occurred in another part of the world – the flight took off from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia en route to Beijing, China. Most of the passengers onboard were from China, but others were from Malaysia and three were from the U.S. There were a total of 239 people on board the plane, including flight personnel.

Williams has experience in dealing with a lawsuit involving a foreign airline. He represented the daughter of an Iranian man who was killed in the Caspian Airlines Flight 7908 that occurred in July 2009. The daughter resided outside of San Francisco.

The differences between representing someone in an international air disaster versus one that occurs in the U.S. are dramatic, he said.

Those that occur in foreign lands, or waters, generally fall under the 1999 Montreal Convention, signed by more than 100 countries. Prior to that, such matters were handled through the Warsaw Convention which dated from the 1920s-1930s. Not as many countries were part of the Warsaw Convention. Williams noted that Iran, in the case of the Caspian Airlines crash, was not one of the countries that signed the Montreal Convention.

The Montreal Convention, he said, essentially provides the rights and remedies for family members who lost a loved one as a result of a plane crash.

Keith Williams and Jim Stocks discuss plane crash lawThe treaty, as it is also called, allows for “determination of the venue where a lawsuit may be brought against Malaysia Airlines and limits on the airline’s liability,” he said.

It also provides choices for venues for damage claims to be filed. The claims can be filed, he said, “where the airline has its principal place of business, where the ticket was bought, where the final destination was and where the passenger resided.”

Williams began practicing aviation law some years ago after representing a family in a medical malpractice case in Kentucky. The family had a friend who died in a plane crash, and they referred the case to him.

And, no, Williams is not a pilot, something he is often asked, he said.

What happened to Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 will take a long time to determine, but more often than not, he noted, such matters are “almost always a products liability case.” And if it is determined that something on the plane was defective in some way, then “there’s going to be a lot of lawsuits. Malaysia Airlines will point at Boeing, Boeing will point at Honeywell. It gets to be a big mess,” and more than one court will sort it out.

In the meantime, families have two years to file a lawsuit under the provisions of the Montreal Convention – that is, two years from the date of the crash.

Williams serves as vice chair of the Aviation Section of the American Association for Justice. Through that organization, he is also in regular contact with a number of aviation experts who have been appearing on national TV news shows discussing Flight 370.

There is much speculation about what happened, he said, ranging from something done intentionally to the loss of cabin pressure.

Regarding reports that one of the pilots had a flight simulator at his home, Williams said that was not unusual and was a way for pilots to keep up with changing technology.

“There are programs for lawyers to practice objections,” he added, so pilots practicing flying with the use of a simulator was not out of the question.

Among other cases Williams has been involved in, he represented a number of plaintiffs and was on the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in multi-party complex litigation concerning the crash of Comair Flight 5191 in Lexington, Ky., in August 2006. He represented passengers on an American Airlines flight that involved an in-flight engine fire and emergency landing, represents several passengers injured in the Southwest Airlines Flight 345 hard landing at LaGuardia Airport and represented the parents of a deceased helicopter pilot against the helicopter manufacturer, owner and fixed based operator following the crash of the helicopter.
X Close Window Visit The Lannom & Williams Press Page